Qwen 3.8 Max vs GPT-5.4 Workhorse
Both models are live in the Cybrdeck playground. Instead of trusting a single answer or a generic leaderboard, run the same prompt through Qwen 3.8 Max and GPT-5.4 Workhorse side by side and diff the results in the consensus studio — with real latency and credit cost shown per model.
Qwen 3.8 Max
Alibaba's newest flagship. Multimodal hybrid-thinking model with 1M context, native image understanding, and controllable reasoning depth via enable_thinking.
GPT-5.4 Workhorse
Highly accurate, fast, and cost-efficient OpenAI model for everyday production workloads.
Spec comparison
Which costs less on Cybrdeck?
Qwen 3.8 Max burns 10 credits per 1,000 output tokens; GPT-5.4 Workhorse burns 14.25. Qwen 3.8 Max is the lower-cost option for the same output volume. Credit rates are Cybrdeck's published playground multipliers, so the numbers move with the catalog rather than a snapshot.
Frequently asked
What is the difference between Qwen 3.8 Max and GPT-5.4 Workhorse?+
Qwen 3.8 Max is served by Alibaba with a 1.0M-token context window; GPT-5.4 Workhorse comes from OpenAI with 1.1M tokens. In Cybrdeck you run both on the same prompt and diff the answers side by side instead of trusting a single model's take.
Which is cheaper to run, Qwen 3.8 Max or GPT-5.4 Workhorse?+
On Cybrdeck credits, Qwen 3.8 Max burns 10 credits per 1,000 output tokens and GPT-5.4 Workhorse burns 14.25. Qwen 3.8 Max is the lower-cost option for the same output volume.
Can I use Qwen 3.8 Max and GPT-5.4 Workhorse side by side?+
Yes. The Cybrdeck playground runs multiple models on one prompt in a consensus studio, so you see exactly where Qwen 3.8 Max and GPT-5.4 Workhorse agree and where they diverge — starting on the free tier.
Which model should I pick for cost and latency?+
It depends on your workload. Run both against your own prompt in the playground: Cybrdeck shows latency and credit cost per model, so you decide from your real task rather than a generic leaderboard.